In ‘Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice,’ there are no winners


With two of the most beloved characters in the world, a respected film director, a stellar cast and a quarter of a million dollars, it seems nearly impossible to produce a terrible movie. With that being said, Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice has done the impossible.

With Zack Snyder at the helm, a terribly structured plot and even worse casting choices take the film from an idea with a plethora of possibilities to a very dark spot in the rich history of both Batman and Superman.

The film begins with Bruce Wayne (Ben Affleck) witnessing first-hand the destruction caused by Superman’s (Henry Cavill) final battle with General Zodd in Man of Steel, leading him to the conclusion that Superman should be stopped, a conclusion that Superman soon comes to about Batman, as well.

After that, the story becomes quite confusing.

Like Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns, which both Affleck and Snyder cited as an influence for the film, there are several plot lines that clumsily weave together, leaving the audience wondering exactly what’s going on. There’s, of course, the main conflict of Batman v. Superman, but there’s also Batman v. Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg), Lex Luthor v. Superman, Lex Luthor v. the government, Superman v. the government and scenes of Lois Lane (Amy Adams) secretly meeting with a high-level public official. Add a good bit of Kryptonite to the mix, and the audience is left with a jumbled mess to sort through.

There is some salvation at the end as the last twenty minutes of the film play out similarly to The Dark Knight Returns but with a slight tweak, adding a fresh cherry to the melted and off-putting sundae created during the first two hours.

Cavill manages to pull off another decent performance as Superman, who finds himself at odds with the people of Metropolis and again dealing with whether he belongs in society. Cavill’s performance may be the most substantial in the film, but that’s not really that high of a compliment.

Affleck’s portrayal of Batman strongly resembles Miller’s interpretation of the character as an older Dark Knight who has become much more ruthless and often strays from his strict moral code (like branding the criminals he apprehends, inevitably leading to their murder by fellow inmates). The problem with Ben Affleck, though, is that he’s Ben Affleck. It’s hard to see Bruce Wayne as Bruce Wayne when he’s so uncomfortably and irritatingly Affleck-y.

Making even less sense than casting Affleck, Jesse Eisenberg’s portrayal of Lex Luthor leaves much to be desired. The film shows a younger version of Luthor, which carries the potential to be great, but Eisenberg causes the character to fall on the opposite end of the spectrum. Every time Luthor is on the screen feels like Eisenberg doing a bad impersonation of Heath Ledger’s Joker while dressed as Jim Carrey’s Edward Nygma. Not the Riddler. Long-haired, labcoat-wearing, smart, yet psychotic Edward Nygma.

The rest of the cast delivers solid performances, but none of them really stand out, which is a shame considering the incredible talent involved. Amy Adams, Laurence Fishburne, and Diane Lane reprise their roles from Man of Steel, but offer nothing special to the film. Jeremy Irons delivers a solid performance as Alfred, as well, but the character’s appearances are too brief to make an impact.

One bright spot of the film, though, is the first live-action film appearance of Diana Prince/Wonder Woman. First seen as a mystery woman at a party thrown by Lex Luthor, she eventually shows up donning the costume and lasso towards the end and plays a pivotal role in setting up the upcoming Justice League films, which seems to be the ultimate goal of the film, raising the question: is $250 million too much to spend to set up an upcoming film? Let’s hope so.

All in all, Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice is a disappointment to fans of both the Caped Crusader and the Man of Steel. Snyder relies too heavily on a 30-year-old Batman story to direct the film, and there’s way too much going on throughout for it to be enjoyable. Sure, the ending may be spectacular, but not quite spectacular enough to justify sitting through two hours of a film to get there.

Though it’s never really answered who wins when it comes to Batman v. Superman, one thing remains clear: it’s certainly not the fans.

For more stories and updates, follow us at www.mtsusidelines.com, on Facebook at MTSU Sidelines and on Twitter/Instagram at @Sidelines_Life.

To contact Lifestyles editor Tanner Dedmon email lifestyles@mtsusidelines.com.

Previous Op-Ed: What makes superhero films so superior?
Next Clinton vs. Sanders: Which candidate do millennial women want?

2 Comments

  1. Sarah
    March 29, 2016
    Reply

    Batman v Superman isn’t supposed to be about who wins. Nor is it supposed to completely be about Batman fighting Superman. It’s about a clash of morals. Batman sees Superman as this all powerful being, he thinks that he is too strong or too powerful and must be stopped. This movie is set up to portray a much older Batman. If you are a fan of the comics you can understand why this is so important. It means he’s been through A LOT. The death of Robin and presumably a lot more mental trama. This is shown by his nightmares and his need to stop someone as powerful as Superman. Even during a scene in the movie where he is visited by someone from the future (Flash) that says they came too early. To quote “You were right about him, you have to find us, Lois is the key”. They set up so well for the rest of the DCU it’s almost impossible to call yourself a fan of either of these heroes and NOT like how well the movie was set up. Admittedly there were a couple of hiccups, but the way they set up the future of the Justice League was incredible. It’s titled Dawn of Justice for a reason, it’s the dawn of the Justice League. I think you should look a little deeper into the history of these characters and their stories before you begin to label something as terrible just because you couldn’t follow along.

  2. Kvs2h
    February 24, 2017
    Reply

    Coming from a huge Batman fan, I have to say that I was quite disappointed with this movie. I believe that most of us expected for the movie to be a Batman versus Superman movie rather than a Teamwork movie. I would like to agree that this is about the Batman comic books, but as we all know most of these movies do not follow the comics correctly. Since I love that man so much I might just like this movie because it’s kind of the trade him as we compared to Superman.This movie morally falls Justice League which I hope will be a success since it is being created by D.C. I do not believe that they portrayed Batman’s mental and physical perfection, or his martial art and detective skills very well. In the movie The Story becomes quite confusing, but I believe that maybe in the Justice League movie it will become more clear. The film shows the flash from the future warning Batman that he was right about Superman, now I’m not sure if this was Lex Luthor putting images in his head or if there is more to come. Overall I do like jesse Eisenberg’s Portrayal of Lex Luthor in the movie and I hope to see him in the Justice League film.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.