Theatrical releases in January often arrive with modest expectations, and “Mercy” fits neatly among them, delivering a digestible and occasionally entertaining thriller.
What sets the film apart is not its recognizable cast or explosive stunts, but its relationship with artificial intelligence.
Trailers and marketing suggested an examination of AI’s overbearing role in society, but what the film ultimately presents is closer to a glorification of technological advancement.
In the film, detective Chris Raven (Chris Pratt) is sentenced to trial by an AI judge he helped create, triggering a nonlinear narrative that pieces together the murder of Raven’s wife.
Much of the narrative unfolds in the Mercy courtroom, where Judge Maddox (Rebecca Ferguson) grants Raven broad access to cellphones, surveillance footage and digital records as he races to prove his innocence.
The narrative structure simulates a digitized crimeboard, with imaginary red yarn connecting leads to suspects and motives to unsuspected individuals.
Raven receives information exclusively through the screens surrounding him, jumping from conversations with police officers to reviewing footage of potential suspects. This stylistic choice places the viewer into a high-anxiety experience as they attempt to solve the crime alongside the accused.
Where traditional murder mysteries leave breadcrumbs for viewers to satisfyingly piece together, “Mercy” instead relies on shocking revelations that feel unearned. It’s a thrill ride, but unpredictable without narrative groundwork.
As Raven races to solve his wife’s murder, Maddox’s programming grows increasingly unstable. These two narratives — Raven on trial and the AI’s imperfections — unfold side by side but rarely meaningfully complement each other.
Ethical concerns surrounding AI are repeatedly raised, only to be brushed aside in favor of spectacle. “Mercy” repeatedly presents Maddox as a near-mystical force — capable of surveillance, moral judgement and prediction — but rarely unpacks this thematically.
The rhetoric that emerges is implicitly pro-AI. The technology is framed as efficient and necessary. One line explicitly likens AI’s capacity for error and growth to that of humans.
Pratt’s performance is similarly restrained. With Raven strapped to a chair, his character is boiled down to reactions rather than action.
From “Guardians of the Galaxy” to “The Lego Movie,” Pratt has demonstrated range across previous roles, but this film’s script and direction place him in a box and stifle his talents.
Ferguson dominates the scenes they share, with her composed portrayal of Judge Maddox that demands attention.
As the film approaches its ending, “Mercy” seems to have a semi-coherent idea of what it wants to say about AI, but it comes to a screeching halt as the script desperately tries to stick the landing.
By doubling down on shock and resolution instead of reflection, the film ties itself into a ragged bow, collapsing under the weight of its ambition.
The vision of AI present in its marketing is undeniably interesting, but what is revealed during the runtime is an unwillingness to say anything of substance.
“Mercy” boils down to a simple experience: entertaining in the moment, but thematically empty once the clock runs out.
To contact the features editor, email [email protected].
For more news, visit www.mtsusidelines.com, and follow us on Facebook at MTSU Sidelines and on X and Instagram at @mtsusidelines. Also, sign up for our weekly newsletter here.
